--- author: Sam White toc-title: Contents toc-depth: 5 toc-location: left layout: post title: PCR - Crassostrea gigas and sikamea Mantle gDNA from Marinelli Shellfish Company date: '2019-11-21 11:05' tags: - Crassostrea gigas - Crassostrea sikamea - Pacific oyster - Kumamoto - PCR - Apex - gel categories: - 2019 - Miscellaneous --- ### UPDATE 20191125 Since the results I obtained on my [final attempt to get this to work](https://robertslab.github.io/sams-notebook/posts/2019/2019-11-21-PCR---Crassostrea-gigas-and-sikamea-Mantle-gDNA-from-Marinellie-Shellfish-Company---No-Multiplex/) failed, I decided to double-check the primer sequences. Well, I ordered/used the wrong sequences! The two general _Crassostrea spp._ primers ordered were the 28s primers listed in that paper, instead of the cytochrome oxidase primers! I've ordered the correct universal CO primers, which are actually listed in this paper: - [Folmer, O., M. Black, W. Hoeh, R. Lutz & R. Vrijenhoek. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrate. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3:294–299.](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15316743_DNA_primers_for_amplification_of_mitochondrial_Cytochrome_C_oxidase_subunit_I_from_diverse_metazoan_invertebrates) Will re-run this. I'm leaving the original post below for posterity. --- After [yesterday's PCR debacles](https://robertslab.github.io/sams-notebook/posts/2019/2019-11-19-PCR---Crassostrea-gigas-and-sikamea-Mantle-gDNA-from-Marinelli-Shellfish-Company/), I re-ran the PCRs with the original cylcing parameters, on a long 1.5% agarose (1x low TAE) gel. Primers and cycling parameters were taken from this publication: - [Haiyan Wang and Ximing Guo "Identification of Crassostrea ariakensis and Related Oysters by Multiplex Species-Specific PCR," Journal of Shellfish Research 27(3), 481-487, (1 May 2008).](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ximing_Guo/publication/259643859_Identification_of_Crassostrea_ariakensis_and_related_oysters_by_multiplex_species-specific_PCR/links/55c79eb708aeb9756746e35e/Identification-of-Crassostrea-ariakensis-and-related-oysters-by-multiplex-species-specific-PCR.pdf) | SR ID | Primer Name | Sequence | |-------|-------------|----------------------------| | 1727 | COreverse | CAGGGGGCCGTTCGCGGTCAACGCT | | 1726 | COCsi546r | AAGTAACCTTAATAGATCAGGGAACC | | 1725 | COCgi269r | TCGAGGAAATTGCATGTCTGCTACAA | | 1724 | COforward | GGGACTACCCCCTGAATTTAAGCAT | This is a multiplex PCR, where the COforward/reverse primers should amplify any _Crassostrea spp._ DNA (i.e. a positive control - 697bp) and the other two primers will amplify either _C.gigas_ (Cgi269r - 269bp) or _C.sikamea_ (Csi546r - 546bp). Master mix calcs: | Component | Single Rxn Vol. (uL) | Num. Rxns | Total Volumes (uL) | |------------------------|----------------------|-----------|---------------------------| | DNA | 4 | NA | NA | | 2x Apex Master Mix | 12.5 | 18 | 225 | | COforward (100uM) | 0.15 | 18 | 2.7 | | COreverse (100uM) | 0.15 | 18 | 2.7 | | COCgi269r (100uM) | 0.1 | 18 | 1.8 | | COCsi546r (100uM) | 0.1 | 18 | 1.8 | | H2O | 8 | 18 | 144 | | | 25 | | Add 21uL to each PCR tube | Cycling params: 95oC for 10mins 30 cycles of: - 95oC 1min - 51oC 1min - 72oC 1min 72oC 10mins Used the GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (ThermoFisher) for all gels: ![GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix](https://github.com/RobertsLab/resources/blob/master/protocols/Commercial_Protocols/ThermoFisher_OgeneRuler_DNA_Ladder_Mix_F100439.jpg?raw=true) --- # RESULTS Gel: ![Gel of four PCRs from each group of oysters](https://github.com/RobertsLab/sams-notebook/blob/master/images/20191121_gel_C.gigas_C.sikamea-01.jpg?raw=true) Well, despite the very clean appearance of this gel image (defined bands, no bands in NTC), the results are not helpful. 1. Band of ~700bp should be present in _all_ samples (OCforward/reverse primers should amplify any _Crassostrea spp_ DNA)- it isn't present in any of them. 2. The single band generated in each lane is ~500 - 500bp. This band size is relatively close to the expected product size for _Crassostrea sikamea_ detection (546bp). These results _could_ suggest that they actually all are _C.sikamea_. [However, the `C.gigas 1191-SS` are supposed to be verified _C.gigas_; the samples in question were the `C.sikamea 1191-SS`](https://robertslab.github.io/sams-notebook/posts/2019/2019-10-30-Samples-Received---Marinelli-Shellfish-Company-C.gigas-and-C.sikamea-Oysters/). Will discuss with Steven to see how much additional time he'd like to devote to this project to determine if I should re-run each of these samples with the species-specific primers only (i.e. no multiplex).