Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 332 Mapping efficiency: 0.3% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99518 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 150 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 75.5% C methylated in CHG context: 0.8% C methylated in CHH context: 1.5% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 12.5% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 1392 Mapping efficiency: 1.4% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 98079 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 529 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 79.3% C methylated in CHG context: 0.7% C methylated in CHH context: 1.5% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 31.1% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 78 Mapping efficiency: 0.1% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99878 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 44 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 83.2% C methylated in CHG context: 0.1% C methylated in CHH context: 0.7% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 100.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 372 Mapping efficiency: 0.4% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99491 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 137 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 76.4% C methylated in CHG context: 0.8% C methylated in CHH context: 2.9% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 0.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 162 Mapping efficiency: 0.2% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99756 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 82 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 79.9% C methylated in CHG context: 1.0% C methylated in CHH context: 0.9% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 18.2% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 63 Mapping efficiency: 0.1% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99908 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 29 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 82.5% C methylated in CHG context: 0.3% C methylated in CHH context: 4.2% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 16.7% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 411 Mapping efficiency: 0.4% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99370 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 219 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 77.8% C methylated in CHG context: 0.7% C methylated in CHH context: 1.5% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 14.3% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 562 Mapping efficiency: 0.6% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99247 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 191 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 75.4% C methylated in CHG context: 0.7% C methylated in CHH context: 0.8% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 40.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 9 Mapping efficiency: 0.0% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99991 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 0 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 88.3% C methylated in CHG context: 2.0% C methylated in CHH context: 0.4% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 0.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 53 Mapping efficiency: 0.1% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99922 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 25 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 80.7% C methylated in CHG context: 0.4% C methylated in CHH context: 1.0% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 20.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 151 Mapping efficiency: 0.2% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99777 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 72 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 78.8% C methylated in CHG context: 0.8% C methylated in CHH context: 0.9% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 37.5% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 112 Mapping efficiency: 0.1% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99832 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 56 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 77.9% C methylated in CHG context: 0.2% C methylated in CHH context: 1.1% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 40.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 317 Mapping efficiency: 0.3% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99527 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 156 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 80.5% C methylated in CHG context: 1.1% C methylated in CHH context: 2.1% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 66.7% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 436 Mapping efficiency: 0.4% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99436 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 128 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 78.1% C methylated in CHG context: 0.8% C methylated in CHH context: 1.9% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 14.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 57 Mapping efficiency: 0.1% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99916 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 27 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 85.6% C methylated in CHG context: 0.6% C methylated in CHH context: 0.5% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 20.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 698 Mapping efficiency: 0.7% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99049 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 253 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 1 C methylated in CpG context: 78.2% C methylated in CHG context: 0.7% C methylated in CHH context: 0.6% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 39.1% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 63 Mapping efficiency: 0.1% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99895 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 42 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 78.3% C methylated in CHG context: 0.7% C methylated in CHH context: 0.5% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 242 Mapping efficiency: 0.2% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99635 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 123 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 79.6% C methylated in CHG context: 1.5% C methylated in CHH context: 2.6% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 50.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 483 Mapping efficiency: 0.5% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99319 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 198 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 77.6% C methylated in CHG context: 0.8% C methylated in CHH context: 1.0% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 75.0% Sequence pairs analysed in total: 100000 Number of paired-end alignments with a unique best hit: 426 Mapping efficiency: 0.4% Sequence pairs with no alignments under any condition: 99338 Sequence pairs did not map uniquely: 236 Sequence pairs which were discarded because genomic sequence could not be extracted: 0 C methylated in CpG context: 81.6% C methylated in CHG context: 0.9% C methylated in CHH context: 1.7% C methylated in unknown context (CN or CHN): 40.0%