10-diff-methyl-DSS

Kathleen Durkin 2026-09-10

Differential methylation analysis using the DSS package (Dispersion Shrinkage for Sequencing data)

Why DSS here:

Caveats to keep in mind:

Inputs: Bismark coverage files [].deduplicated.bismark.cov.gz, the same ones used in 06.x (stored under ../data/bismark-methyl-extraction/).

1 Setup

I ended up needing to run this code from using a .sh script from the terminal for two reasons. First, Klone doesn’t seem to have the DSS package available, and I don’t seem to have the requisite permissions to install it, so I need to run all of this code within a conda environment. Second, some of these runs are so comuptationally intensive that I need >200G of memory. I therefore needed to request a node with a really high amount of memory on which to run this code.

Below is a copy of the simple .sh script I’m using for the run. From a Klone login node, I can just use the sbatch command to run this .sh script, which will request a suffiently powered node, open a conda environment, and run all R code in this .Rmd file.

#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --account=srlab
#SBATCH --partition=cpu-g2-mem2x
#SBATCH --cpus-per-task=8
#SBATCH --mem=350G
#SBATCH --time=1-00:00:00
#SBATCH --output=dss_%j.out
#SBATCH --error=dss_%j.err
#SBATCH --chdir=/gscratch/srlab/kdurkin1/kathleen-coral/project/code

apptainer exec --bind /gscratch:/gscratch \
 /gscratch/srlab/kdurkin1/srlab-R4.4-bioinformatics-container-703094b.sif \
  bash -c 'source /srlab/programs/miniforge3-24.7.1-0/etc/profile.d/conda.sh && conda activate /gscratch/srlab/kdurkin1/.conda/envs/dss && Rscript -e "rmarkdown::render(\"10.Rmd\")"'
# Install if needed:
# if (!require("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) install.packages("BiocManager")
# BiocManager::install(c("DSS", "bsseq"))

library(DSS)
library(bsseq)
library(readr)
library(dplyr)
library(stringr)
library(tibble)
library(ggplot2)

2 Download methylation calls

(if necessary)

# Run wget to retrieve FastQs and MD5 files
# Note: the --no-clobber command will skip re-downloading any files that are already present in the output directory
wget \
--directory-prefix ../data/bismark-methyl-extraction \
--recursive \
--no-check-certificate \
--continue \
--cut-dirs 4 \
--no-host-directories \
--no-parent \
--quiet \
--no-clobber \
--accept="*.deduplicated.bismark.cov.gz,checksums.md5" https://gannet.fish.washington.edu/gitrepos/ceasmallr/output/02.20-bismark-methylation-extraction/
cd ../data/bismark-methyl-extraction/

echo "How many methylation calling files were downloaded?"
ls *.deduplicated.bismark.cov.gz | wc -l

echo ""

echo "Check file checksums:"
grep '.deduplicated.bismark.cov.gz' checksums.md5 | md5sum -c -

We should have N=32 (n=15 ControlxControl crosses, n=17 ExposedxExposed crosses)

3 Read Bismark coverage into a BSseq object

Bismark .cov columns (no header): chr start end meth% count_methylated count_unmethylated. For DSS we need, per sample, a df with columns chr, pos, N (total coverage), and X (methylated count).

(Positions are 1-based in both Bismark .cov and bsseq, so no offset is needed)

file.list  <- list.files("../data/bismark-methyl-extraction", pattern = "\\.bismark\\.cov\\.gz$", full.names = TRUE)

# As in 06.2, drop the low-yield libraries (<100M Cs)
# BUT, could keep all samples and let DSS handle the coverage differences -- come back to later.
# drop <- c("CF01-CM01-Zygote", "CF08-CM04-Larvae", "CF08-CM05-Larvae", "EF04-EM04-Zygote", "EF05-EM05-Zygote")
# file.list <- file.list[!str_detect(basename(file.list), str_c(drop, collapse = "|"))]

# format sample IDs
sample.ids <- basename(file.list) %>%
  str_replace("_R1_001\\.fastp-trim_bismark_bt2_pe\\.deduplicated\\.bismark\\.cov\\.gz$", "") %>%
  str_replace("_R1_001\\.fastp-trim\\.REPAIRED_bismark_bt2_pe\\.deduplicated\\.bismark\\.cov\\.gz$", ".REP")

# Grab treatment and lifestage info from Sample IDs
#   first letter of the cross code = parental treatment (C = control, E = exposed)
#   stage encoded in the ID string (Zygote / Larvae)
meta <- tibble(
  sample    = sample.ids,
  file      = file.list,
  treatment = case_when(str_starts(sample.ids, "E") ~ "Exposed",
                        str_starts(sample.ids, "C") ~ "Control",
                        TRUE ~ NA_character_),
  stage     = case_when(str_detect(sample.ids, "Zygote") ~ "Zygote",
                        str_detect(sample.ids, "Larvae") ~ "Larvae",
                        TRUE ~ NA_character_)
) %>%
  # reference levels: Control (so the coefficient = effect of exposure) and Zygote (earlier stage)
  mutate(treatment = factor(treatment, levels = c("Control", "Exposed")),
         stage     = factor(stage,     levels = c("Zygote",  "Larvae")))

knitr::kable(count(meta, treatment, stage))
treatment stage n
Control Zygote 8
Control Larvae 7
Exposed Zygote 6
Exposed Larvae 11
colData <- DataFrame(treatment = meta$treatment,
                     stage     = meta$stage,
                     row.names = meta$sample)

BSobj <- read.bismark(files          = meta$file,
                      colData        = colData,
                      rmZeroCov      = TRUE,          # drops positions covered in 0 samples
                      strandCollapse = FALSE,         # .cov isn't a cytosine report; leave off
                      BPPARAM        = MulticoreParam(workers = 12, progressbar = TRUE),
                      verbose        = TRUE)
## [read.bismark] Parsing files and constructing valid loci ...

##   |                                                                              |                                                                      |   0%  |                                                                              |==                                                                    |   3%  |                                                                              |=====                                                                 |   6%  |                                                                              |=======                                                               |  10%  |                                                                              |=========                                                             |  13%  |                                                                              |===========                                                           |  16%  |                                                                              |==============                                                        |  19%  |                                                                              |================                                                      |  23%  |                                                                              |==================                                                    |  26%  |                                                                              |====================                                                  |  29%  |                                                                              |=======================                                               |  32%  |                                                                              |=========================                                             |  35%  |                                                                              |===========================                                           |  39%  |                                                                              |=============================                                         |  42%  |                                                                              |================================                                      |  45%  |                                                                              |==================================                                    |  48%  |                                                                              |====================================                                  |  52%  |                                                                              |======================================                                |  55%  |                                                                              |=========================================                             |  58%  |                                                                              |===========================================                           |  61%  |                                                                              |=============================================                         |  65%  |                                                                              |===============================================                       |  68%  |                                                                              |==================================================                    |  71%  |                                                                              |====================================================                  |  74%  |                                                                              |======================================================                |  77%  |                                                                              |========================================================              |  81%  |                                                                              |===========================================================           |  84%  |                                                                              |=============================================================         |  87%  |                                                                              |===============================================================       |  90%  |                                                                              |=================================================================     |  94%  |                                                                              |====================================================================  |  97%  |                                                                              |======================================================================| 100%

## Done in 69 secs

## [read.bismark] Parsing files and constructing 'M' and 'Cov' matrices ...

##   |                                                                              |                                                                      |   0%  |                                                                              |==                                                                    |   3%  |                                                                              |====                                                                  |   6%  |                                                                              |=======                                                               |   9%  |                                                                              |=========                                                             |  12%  |                                                                              |===========                                                           |  16%  |                                                                              |=============                                                         |  19%  |                                                                              |===============                                                       |  22%  |                                                                              |==================                                                    |  25%  |                                                                              |====================                                                  |  28%  |                                                                              |======================                                                |  31%  |                                                                              |========================                                              |  34%  |                                                                              |==========================                                            |  38%  |                                                                              |============================                                          |  41%  |                                                                              |===============================                                       |  44%  |                                                                              |=================================                                     |  47%  |                                                                              |===================================                                   |  50%  |                                                                              |=====================================                                 |  53%  |                                                                              |=======================================                               |  56%  |                                                                              |==========================================                            |  59%  |                                                                              |============================================                          |  62%  |                                                                              |==============================================                        |  66%  |                                                                              |================================================                      |  69%  |                                                                              |==================================================                    |  72%  |                                                                              |====================================================                  |  75%  |                                                                              |=======================================================               |  78%  |                                                                              |=========================================================             |  81%  |                                                                              |===========================================================           |  84%  |                                                                              |=============================================================         |  88%  |                                                                              |===============================================================       |  91%  |                                                                              |==================================================================    |  94%  |                                                                              |====================================================================  |  97%  |                                                                              |======================================================================| 100%

## Done in 26.5 secs

## [read.bismark] Constructing BSseq object ...
BSobj    # positions are the UNION across samples; missing positions get N = 0
## An object of type 'BSseq' with
##   31596324 methylation loci
##   32 samples
## has not been smoothed
## All assays are in-memory
# DSS tolerates missingness
# For now, require non-zero coverage in at least half the samples of each treatment x stage cell to reduce noise
# (MAY WANT TO ADJUST LATER)
cov_mat <- getCoverage(BSobj, type = "Cov")           # loci x samples
cells   <- interaction(meta$treatment, meta$stage, drop = TRUE)

keep <- Reduce(`&`, lapply(levels(cells), function(cl) {
  idx <- which(cells == cl)
  rowSums(cov_mat[, idx, drop = FALSE] > 0) >= ceiling(length(idx) / 2)
}))

BSobj <- BSobj[keep, ]
cat("Loci retained after coverage filter:", nrow(BSobj), "\n")
## Loci retained after coverage filter: 6337469

EDIT: All of the downstream model fitting calls are super intensive and take forever to run. Since I have to run this from Rscript, and thus cannot easily retain R objects between runs, this is making script troubleshooting super time-intensive and annoying. To facilitate troubleshooting, I’m going to add a test run option that will randomly subsample a tiny fraction of the data to proceed with. ONLY use this for test-runs

# Keeps all samples but randomly thins loci genome-wide
# set test_run to FALSE for full-data runs
test_run  <- FALSE 
test_frac <- 0.02      # keep 2% of loci

if (test_run) {
  set.seed(1)
  idx   <- sort(sample(nrow(BSobj), size = floor(nrow(BSobj) * test_frac)))
  BSobj <- BSobj[idx, ]
  cat("TEST RUN — loci subsampled to:", nrow(BSobj), "\n")
}

Also save the set of loci being tested in the following analyses (for reference when evaluating the effects of including/excluding my low-coverage offspring samples)

gr <- granges(BSobj)
tested <- data.frame(chr   = as.character(seqnames(gr)),
                     start = start(gr) - 1L,
                     end   = start(gr))
write_tsv(tested, file.path("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS", "tested_loci.bed.gz"), col_names = FALSE)
cat("Tested-locus set size:", nrow(tested), "loci\n")
## Tested-locus set size: 6337469 loci
# compact summary
knitr::kable(as.data.frame(table(tested$chr)),
             col.names = c("chr", "n_loci_tested"))
chr n_loci_tested
NC_007175.2 869
NC_035780.1 740251
NC_035781.1 688154
NC_035782.1 777576
NC_035783.1 693889
NC_035784.1 1217134
NC_035785.1 350838
NC_035786.1 386124
NC_035787.1 545166
NC_035788.1 709957
NC_035789.1 227511

4 Multi-factor model (design-level tests)

Fit an interaction model for tests of stage-dependence (does effect of parental exposure differ between the life stages)

design <- data.frame(treatment = meta$treatment, stage = meta$stage)

# Interaction model: does the parental-treatment effect differ by stage?
fit_int <- DMLfit.multiFactor(BSobj, design = design,
                              formula = ~ treatment + stage + treatment:stage)
## Fitting DML model for CpG site: 100000 , 200000 , 300000 , 400000 , 500000 , 600000 , 700000 , 800000 , 900000 , 1000000 , 1100000 , 1200000 , 1300000 , 1400000 , 1500000 , 1600000 , 1700000 , 1800000 , 1900000 , 2000000 , 2100000 , 2200000 , 2300000 , 2400000 , 2500000 , 2600000 , 2700000 , 2800000 , 2900000 , 3000000 , 3100000 , 3200000 , 3300000 , 3400000 , 3500000 , 3600000 , 3700000 , 3800000 , 3900000 , 4000000 , 4100000 , 4200000 , 4300000 , 4400000 , 4500000 , 4600000 , 4700000 , 4800000 , 4900000 , 5000000 , 5100000 , 5200000 , 5300000 , 5400000 , 5500000 , 5600000 , 5700000 , 5800000 , 5900000 , 6000000 , 6100000 , 6200000 , 6300000 ,
# Inspect coefficient names so we test the right columns
colnames(fit_int$X)
## [1] "(Intercept)"                  "treatmentExposed"            
## [3] "stageLarvae"                  "treatmentExposed:stageLarvae"
# Expected: "(Intercept)" "treatmentExposed" "stageLarvae" "treatmentExposed:stageLarvae"

4.1 Parental treatment effect

Fit an additive model (no interaction) to test for signal of parental treatment effect while controlling for stage.

Note that, for a multi-factor analysis, DSS doesn’t seem to rely on a threshold of % methylation difference? Just an FDR pval.

fit_add  <- DMLfit.multiFactor(BSobj, design = design, formula = ~ treatment + stage)
## Fitting DML model for CpG site: 100000 , 200000 , 300000 , 400000 , 500000 , 600000 , 700000 , 800000 , 900000 , 1000000 , 1100000 , 1200000 , 1300000 , 1400000 , 1500000 , 1600000 , 1700000 , 1800000 , 1900000 , 2000000 , 2100000 , 2200000 , 2300000 , 2400000 , 2500000 , 2600000 , 2700000 , 2800000 , 2900000 , 3000000 , 3100000 , 3200000 , 3300000 , 3400000 , 3500000 , 3600000 , 3700000 , 3800000 , 3900000 , 4000000 , 4100000 , 4200000 , 4300000 , 4400000 , 4500000 , 4600000 , 4700000 , 4800000 , 4900000 , 5000000 , 5100000 , 5200000 , 5300000 , 5400000 , 5500000 , 5600000 , 5700000 , 5800000 , 5900000 , 6000000 , 6100000 , 6200000 , 6300000 ,
test_trt <- DMLtest.multiFactor(fit_add, coef = "treatmentExposed")
head(test_trt[order(test_trt$pvals), ])
##                 chr      pos      stat        pvals         fdrs
## 2758491 NC_035783.1 47063095 -11.36984 5.909464e-30 3.745105e-23
## 2758495 NC_035783.1 47063138 -11.19611 4.260543e-29 1.350053e-22
## 1609189 NC_035782.1 23797484  10.85410 1.906811e-27 4.028118e-21
## 2758493 NC_035783.1 47063100 -10.73816 6.737196e-27 1.067419e-20
## 1371039 NC_035781.1 54566055 -10.41559 2.104792e-25 2.667810e-19
## 5133966 NC_035787.1 45662859  10.23712 1.351964e-24 1.428005e-18
# DMLs = FDR threshold (multiFactor gives per-site fdrs, not a methylKit-style % difference)
dml_trt <- test_trt[which(test_trt$fdrs < 0.05), ]
cat("Treatment DMLs (FDR < 0.05):", nrow(dml_trt), "\n")
## Treatment DMLs (FDR < 0.05): 11356
# Regions
dmr_trt <- callDMR(test_trt, p.threshold = 0.01, minlen = 50, minCG = 3, dis.merge = 100)
cat("Treatment DMRs:", nrow(dmr_trt), "\n")
## Treatment DMRs: 1893

4.2 Stage-dependence of the treatment effect

A null interaction at treatment-associated loci = inherited signal preserved across stages (H1.2 supported). A significant interaction = the effect differs between zygote and larva, i.e. evidence of developmental reprogramming.

test_intx <- DMLtest.multiFactor(fit_int, coef = "treatmentExposed:stageLarvae")
head(test_intx[order(test_intx$pvals), ])
##                 chr      pos      stat        pvals        fdrs
## 103885  NC_035780.1  8153271 -6.341555 2.274570e-10 0.001441502
## 5475321 NC_035788.1 13004293  6.101735 1.049235e-09 0.002371815
## 3392768 NC_035784.1 41997159 -6.090903 1.122758e-09 0.002371815
## 2876716 NC_035783.1 57225695  5.937695 2.890565e-09 0.004579716
## 5015998 NC_035787.1 27908837 -5.876962 4.178635e-09 0.005257702
## 4215337 NC_035785.1 16140415  5.847915 4.977731e-09 0.005257702
dml_intx <- test_intx[which(test_intx$fdrs < 0.05), ]
cat("Loci with stage-dependent treatment effect (FDR < 0.05):", nrow(dml_intx), "\n")
## Loci with stage-dependent treatment effect (FDR < 0.05): 20

5 Save outputs

save_bed <- function(df, path, score_col) {
  # callDMR() returns NULL when no regions pass; callDML() can return 0 rows.
  # Write an empty .bed in that case rather than erroring, so a knit completes.
  if (is.null(df) || nrow(df) == 0) {
    file.create(path)
    message("save_bed: no rows for ", basename(path), " — wrote empty file.")
    return(invisible(NULL))
  }
  # Region tables (callDMR) carry chr/start/end; single-base DML tables
  # (DMLtest/callDML) carry chr/pos — derive a 0-based, half-open interval.
  if (all(c("chr","start","end") %in% names(df))) {
    start <- df$start; end <- df$end
  } else if (all(c("chr","pos") %in% names(df))) {
    start <- df$pos - 1L; end <- df$pos
  } else {
    stop("save_bed: df lacks chr/start/end or chr/pos for ", basename(path),
         " - columns are: ", paste(names(df), collapse=", "))
  }
  score <- if (score_col %in% names(df)) df[[score_col]] else NA_real_
  bed <- data.frame(chr = df$chr, start = start, end = end, score = score)
  write.table(bed, path, quote = FALSE, sep = "\t", row.names = FALSE, col.names = FALSE)
}

# Site-level tables
write_tsv(test_trt,  file.path("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS", "multifactor_treatment_test.tsv"))
write_tsv(test_intx, file.path("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS", "multifactor_interaction_test.tsv"))

# Region-level BEDs (multifactor DMR uses `areaStat` as region-level test statistic)
save_bed(dmr_trt, file.path("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS", "treatment_DMR.bed"), "areaStat")

6 Two-group smoothed test within each stage

Also want to try within-stage tests with DSS. For non-multifactor tets, DSS makes use of smoothing and dispersion shrinkage to essentiallys “borrow” info across neighboring CpG sites. This cvan be useful for handling low-coverage libraries, which is an existing problem with the zygot libraries.

It also produces effect estimates of the same type as methylKit (% methylation difference), which could be useful for more direct comparisons to the conventions used in Rondon et al. 2017 and Venkataraman et al. 2024. It would also be useful for questions involving directional concordance (hyper- v hypo-methylation)

WARNING: Both the Zygote and Larvae stage-specific DMLtest() runs are very memory-intensive. I’ve needed to up the node request to ~300G just to successfully complete them, and it takes a while to finish.

run_stage <- function(stage_label) {
  s_idx  <- which(meta$stage == stage_label)
  BS_s   <- BSobj[, s_idx]
  g_exp  <- meta$sample[s_idx][meta$treatment[s_idx] == "Exposed"]
  g_ctrl <- meta$sample[s_idx][meta$treatment[s_idx] == "Control"]
  dml <- DMLtest(BS_s, group1 = g_exp, group2 = g_ctrl, smoothing = TRUE)
  out <- list(
    dml = callDML(dml, delta = 0.25, p.threshold = 0.01),
    dmr = callDMR(dml, delta = 0.10, p.threshold = 0.01,
                  minlen = 50, minCG = 3, dis.merge = 100, pct.sig = 0.5)
  )
  # write per-stage results to disk immediately, so a later crash can't lose them
  saveRDS(dml, file.path("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS", paste0(stage_label, "_DMLtest.rds")))
  write_tsv(as.data.frame(dml), file.path("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS", paste0(stage_label, "_DMLtest.tsv.gz")))
  
  rm(dml, BS_s); gc()
  out
}
res_zyg <- run_stage("Zygote"); gc()
## Smoothing ...
## Estimating dispersion for each CpG site, this will take a while ...

## Warning in mclapply(1:nrow(X2), foo, mc.cores = ncores): scheduled cores 127,
## 130, 137, 150, 154, 167, 171, 179, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189 did
## not deliver results, all values of the jobs will be affected

## Warning in shrk.phi[ix] <- shrk.phi2: number of items to replace is not a
## multiple of replacement length

## Warning in mclapply(1:nrow(X2), foo, mc.cores = ncores): scheduled cores 124,
## 128, 138, 152, 153, 154, 156, 157, 158, 161, 162, 163, 165, 167, 169, 170, 171,
## 172, 173, 174, 175, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 183, 184, 185, 186 did not deliver
## results, all values of the jobs will be affected

## Warning in shrk.phi[ix] <- shrk.phi2: number of items to replace is not a
## multiple of replacement length

## Computing test statistics ...

##              used   (Mb) gc trigger    (Mb)   max used    (Mb)
## Ncells   10574794  564.8   27015671  1442.8   27015671  1442.8
## Vcells 1020658173 7787.1 2973613454 22686.9 2973610954 22686.9
res_lar <- run_stage("Larvae"); gc()
## Smoothing ...
## Estimating dispersion for each CpG site, this will take a while ...
## Computing test statistics ...

##              used   (Mb) gc trigger    (Mb)   max used    (Mb)
## Ncells   10574857  564.8   27015671  1442.8   27015671  1442.8
## Vcells 1020746151 7787.7 2973613454 22686.9 2973611614 22686.9
cat("Zygote: DMLs =", nrow(res_zyg$dml), " DMRs =", nrow(res_zyg$dmr), "\n")
## Zygote: DMLs = 5859  DMRs = 4393
cat("Larvae: DMLs =", nrow(res_lar$dml), " DMRs =", nrow(res_lar$dmr), "\n")
## Larvae: DMLs = 4183  DMRs = 3963

Use existing .rds saves if available

# summarise_stage <- function(stage) {
#   rds <- file.path("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS", paste0(stage, "_DMLtest.rds"))
#   if (!file.exists(rds)) {
#     message(stage, ": ", basename(rds), " not found — skipping")
#     return(NULL)
#   }
# 
#   dml_test <- readRDS(rds)   # the full DMLtest() output (per-CpG stats)
# 
#   # Called DMLs and DMRs (same thresholds as the 06.3 run)
#   dmls <- callDML(dml_test, delta = 0.25, p.threshold = 0.01)
#   dmrs <- callDMR(dml_test, delta = 0.10, p.threshold = 0.01,
#                   minlen = 50, minCG = 3, dis.merge = 100, pct.sig = 0.5)
# 
#   # callDMR returns NULL if no regions pass
#   n_dmr <- if (is.null(dmrs)) 0L else nrow(dmrs)
# 
#   cat("\n===", stage, "===\n")
#   cat("CpG sites tested:      ", nrow(dml_test), "\n")
#   cat("DMLs (|diff|>0.25, p<0.01):", nrow(dmls), "\n")
#   cat("  hyper (exposed > control):", sum(dmls$diff > 0), "\n")
#   cat("  hypo  (exposed < control):", sum(dmls$diff < 0), "\n")
#   cat("DMRs:                  ", n_dmr, "\n")
#   if (n_dmr > 0) {
#     cat("  mean DMR length (bp): ", round(mean(dmrs$length), 1), "\n")
#     cat("  mean CpGs per DMR:    ", round(mean(dmrs$nCG), 1), "\n")
#   }
# 
#   invisible(list(test = dml_test, dml = dmls, dmr = dmrs))
# }
# 
# zyg <- summarise_stage("Zygote")
# lar <- summarise_stage("Larvae")

7 Save outputs

# Per-stage DML BEDs (diff = mu1 - mu2 = exposed - control)
save_bed(res_zyg$dml, "../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/zygote_DML.bed", "diff")
save_bed(res_lar$dml, "../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/larvae_DML.bed", "diff")

# Region-level BEDs (diff.Methy is exposed - control at the region level)
save_bed(res_zyg$dmr, "../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/zygote_DMR.bed", "diff.Methy")
save_bed(res_lar$dmr, "../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/larvae_DMR.bed", "diff.Methy")

7.1 Directional concordance with parental gamete DMLs

07.2 only tested positional overlap, but we’re also interested in directional agreement (hyper/hypo).

As a priliminary check for shared signal, read in the parental beds (sperm/egg DMLs, column 5 = parental methylation diff), join to the offspring DMLs on chr + pos, and compare the sign of the difference.

zyg_dmls <- read_tsv("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/zygote_DML.bed",
                  col_names = c("chr", "start", "end", "zyg_diff"))
## Rows: 5859 Columns: 4
## -- Column specification --------------------------------------------------------
## Delimiter: "\t"
## chr (1): chr
## dbl (3): start, end, zyg_diff
## 
## i Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## i Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
lar_dmls <- read_tsv("../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/larvae_DML.bed",
                  col_names = c("chr", "start", "end", "lar_diff"))
## Rows: 4183 Columns: 4
## -- Column specification --------------------------------------------------------
## Delimiter: "\t"
## chr (1): chr
## dbl (3): start, end, lar_diff
## 
## i Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## i Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
sperm <- read_tsv("../data/adult_male_dml.bed",
                  col_names = c("chr", "start", "end", "strand", "par_diff")) %>%
  transmute(chr, start, end = end - 1, par_diff = par_diff/100)
## Rows: 4175 Columns: 5
## -- Column specification --------------------------------------------------------
## Delimiter: "\t"
## chr (2): chr, strand
## dbl (3): start, end, par_diff
## 
## i Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## i Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
egg <- read_tsv("../data/adult_female_dml.bed",
                  col_names = c("chr", "start", "end", "strand", "par_diff")) %>%
  transmute(chr, start, end = end - 1, par_diff = par_diff/100)
## Rows: 128 Columns: 5
## -- Column specification --------------------------------------------------------
## Delimiter: "\t"
## chr (2): chr, strand
## dbl (3): start, end, par_diff
## 
## i Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## i Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
shared_zyg_egg <- inner_join(zyg_dmls, egg, by = c("chr", "start", "end")) %>%
  mutate(concordant = sign(zyg_diff) == sign(par_diff))

shared_lar_egg<- inner_join(lar_dmls, egg, by = c("chr", "start", "end")) %>%
  mutate(concordant = sign(lar_diff) == sign(par_diff))

summarise(shared_zyg_egg, n_shared = n(), n_concordant = sum(concordant),
          pct_concordant = mean(concordant) * 100)
## # A tibble: 1 x 3
##   n_shared n_concordant pct_concordant
##      <int>        <int>          <dbl>
## 1        1            1            100
summarise(shared_lar_egg, n_shared = n(), n_concordant = sum(concordant),
          pct_concordant = mean(concordant) * 100)
## # A tibble: 1 x 3
##   n_shared n_concordant pct_concordant
##      <int>        <int>          <dbl>
## 1        2            2            100
shared_zyg_sperm <- inner_join(zyg_dmls, sperm, by = c("chr", "start", "end")) %>%
  mutate(concordant = sign(zyg_diff) == sign(par_diff))

shared_lar_sperm <- inner_join(lar_dmls, sperm, by = c("chr", "start", "end")) %>%
  mutate(concordant = sign(lar_diff) == sign(par_diff))

summarise(shared_zyg_sperm, n_shared = n(), n_concordant = sum(concordant),
          pct_concordant = mean(concordant) * 100)
## # A tibble: 1 x 3
##   n_shared n_concordant pct_concordant
##      <int>        <int>          <dbl>
## 1       96           96            100
summarise(shared_lar_sperm, n_shared = n(), n_concordant = sum(concordant),
          pct_concordant = mean(concordant) * 100)
## # A tibble: 1 x 3
##   n_shared n_concordant pct_concordant
##      <int>        <int>          <dbl>
## 1       70           70            100
write_tsv(dplyr::select(shared_zyg_egg, -concordant), "../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/shared_zygote_egg_DML.bed", col_names=TRUE)
write_tsv(dplyr::select(shared_lar_egg, -concordant), "../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/shared_larvae_egg_DML.bed", col_names=TRUE)

write_tsv(dplyr::select(shared_zyg_sperm, -concordant), "../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/shared_zygote_sperm_DML.bed", col_names=TRUE)
write_tsv(dplyr::select(shared_lar_sperm, -concordant), "../output/10-diff-methyl-DSS/shared_larvae_sperm_DML.bed", col_names=TRUE)

For a real answer, however, we’d want to (a) re-evaluate parental differential methylation signal using DSS as well (instead of relying on the DMLs that were previously identified by Venkataraman et al using methylKit), and (b) test whether parent-offspring DML overlap exceeds chance (“enriched”)