--- title: "5/2 Meeting with Andrea and Dan" author: "Kathleen Durkin" date: "2025-05-02" categories: ["SIFP_2025"] format: html bibliography: ../../../references.bib --- Meeting with Andrea Quattrini, advisor for SIFP, and Dan MacGuigan, collaborator who has worked a lot with Nanopore sequencing (MinION and PromethION) ### Major Questions: **Dealing w fungal contamination?** **Adaptive sampling?** **How many samples can we multiplex?** **Ligation vs rapid sequencing?** ### Notes: - Smithsonian has a MinION! - flow cells have pretty short shelf life, so even if other Smithsonian folks have leftover reagents, will likely need to order new - will need a reference genome, both for downstream analyses and for adaptive sampling - could also use a de novo genome from sequencing the recent samples - with very fresh tissue, since the genome is p small, could get close to chromosome level genome assembly with nanopore. Andrea notes though that they've had a lot of trouble with assembling coral genomes, possibly due to weird genome architecture. - So maybe genome assembly could be a bonus if the species we use ends up being straightforward to assemble, but for now we should try to find samples that at least fall in same genus as a published genome. Will be trickier if we're using octocorals (for the better sequencing) - Andrea will look at the collections and available octocoral genomes to see if there's a good candidate. - adaptive sampling could help reduce sequencing of contaminants, but might be less useful with degraded dna (short reads can end up being fully sequenced before pores have a chance to kick them out) - Will ideally want 20x - 30x coverage for methylation calls. Can probably look into what coverage v depth we want for methylation calling - MinION flowcell specs: - could try a test run with minion flongle: - look/ask around about accessing a promethion. - With the wash kits you don't actually run the while library each time, you split it up. SO using wash doesn't require more library. - Will need to check seq length/molarity (Smithsonian has the tools for this) - Expect fragmentation to be an issue. In Andrea's experience, coral hDNA fragments are max \~1000bp. Should look into how fragmentation could/will affect methylation calling. Could think about a size selection? Should ask folks in meeting next week about their experience - make a list of things Andrea needs to buy. ### My to-dos: 1. Look more into what coverage v depth we want for methylation calling 2. Look into how use of fragmented DNA can affect methylation calling, including any differences between MinION and PromethION 3. Looks into accessing a PromethION sequencer at a nearby facility - Johns Hopkins (Baltimore, MD) has a PromethION, but I can't find additional details for requesting use right now, because the webpage for their [Genetic Resources Core Facility](http://grcf.med.jhu.edu/) is down - NIH Center for Cancer Research (Bethesda, MD) is close , but it looks like they only allow NIH employees/affiliates to use their [sequencing facilities](https://ostr.ccr.cancer.gov/resources/provider_details/nih-intramural-sequencing-center-nisc). I'd also guess they're in a lot of tummult right now - UW has a Nanopore Sequencing Core which uses a PromethION. Note sure if I can request a quote from them without sample details (e.g. extraction method, dna concentration), but they have a table of cost estimates [here](https://millerlaboratory.com/uw-nsc.html).\ If I'm understanding the "services" correctly, it looks like it's \$1,210/flow cell and \~\$40/sample for Barcoding with Rapid Prep libraries. I may also be cheaper if we want to multiplex 4 or more samples on a single flow cell. So say we wanted to do 12 samples, multiplex w 4 samples per flow cell: 1210\*(3 flow cells) + 40\*(12 samples) = \$4,110 Optimistically I think we could do it on just two PromethION flow cells: 1210\*2+40\*12 = \$2,900